Communication

Saturday, October 10, 2009

Group Communication

In life, it is inevitable that we have to work in groups, be it in school or at work. What exactly is a group? According to Trenholm(2004), a group is a collection of individuals who, as a result of interacting with one another over time, become interdependent, developing shared patterns of behaviour and a collective identity. Have you ever wondered why do we have to communicate in groups? One of the reasons is because groups can provide support and commitment to one and it meets member’s interpersonal needs such as inclusion, control and affection. Also, it establishes group synergy as we have more help compared to when working alone.

To manage group communication, we must first understand that problems can be solved through effective group interactions. Group socialisation is where individuals interact with members of the group to influence each other and best meet their needs. Individuals will then measure how much they can benefit from the group and this process is known as evaluation and this determines their allegiance to the group. According to Moreland and Levine, there are five stages in this process. Take for example my project group in school, we had to be grouped into groups of 4 and everyone in class was a prospective member of my group as my teacher randomly arranged us. When the group was formed, I am a new member. The responsibility of a full member kicks in when I was assigned my first task. Once I finished that project, I would then be a marginal member. When I already graduated from school, I then am an ex-member.

As we work as a group, there will be group pressure that is, to balance between individual and group needs. We also need to gain support from other members. In order to maintain the group, members must be able to assume both roles – as an individual as well as a group member. Conflicts amongst group members are also unavoidable. There was once when my group member actually left our group discussion just because we could not agree on the same thing. She felt that we did not support any of her ideas at all. It took us a long time to sort out the problem eventually and finish the project.

There are also models of group development such as Bruce Tuckman’s five stage model (1965) and Aubrey Fisher’s four-phase model(1970s). These models mostly show us what happens when one forms a group. Here is a link for you to understand more on each model:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_development#Tuckman
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_development#Fisher

On the other hand, while working as a group, we may encounter complex decisions, resources, and may face conflicts. It is dangerous to have the ‘groupthink’ mindset - “a mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when members’ strivings for unanimity override their motivation to realistically appraise alternative courses of action.” – Irving Jarvis. We tend to ignore positive interpretation and assume that we are always right. Therefore, we should keep a lookout for symptoms such as illusion of invulnerability and shared stereotypes to prevent our group from having the groupthink mindset. To combat groupthink, we should appoint someone that is receptive to different responses and views and looks for alternatives to solutions. We should also monitor group behaviour and be aware of these symptoms.

Below are links to websites that might help you understand more about group communication:
http://www.abacon.com/commstudies/groups/group.html

http://www.dpi.vic.gov.au

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small-group_communication

Was your experience with your group an enjoyable one? Or have you experienced bad relationship with your group? Feel free to express your views on group communication!

19 Comments:

  • At October 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM , Anonymous UrLoyalReader said...

    Great analysis you have up there. Even though it is unavoidable for a group to have conflicts, it can improve the communication between the groups. As having conflicts between them, they can actually voice out their unhappiness and thus, misunderstandings or disagreements can be solved. This, in turn, helps the group to bond and communicate better. Therefore, conflicts are essential
    for group communication.

     
  • At October 18, 2009 at 10:23 PM , Anonymous YuXin said...

    My personal experiences with my group sometimes were not pleasant too. There were cases where there were free riders in the group who took credits for what the group has done without any contribution. Due to this issue, it led to conflicts between group members and hindered our process.

     
  • At October 19, 2009 at 10:34 AM , Anonymous Richard said...

    I believe that working in a group is more beneficial as compared to just working alone. Working alone might mean being able to meet deadlines because we do not have to wait for all the members to agree before making a decision. However, working as a group helps to build rapport between group members and also team spirit. This enables the group to work well together and hand in assignments on time.

     
  • At October 19, 2009 at 2:05 PM , Anonymous Esther said...

    With reference to the 'groupthink' phenomenon, what do you think would be a good way to combat this occurence? I have heard of groups needing a 'devil's advocate' in order to avoid errors in judgement. Do you think having such a member would help negate the effects of groupthink?

     
  • At October 19, 2009 at 10:11 PM , Anonymous en said...

    Yes it definitely would. The role of the devil's advocate is to be open to alternatives and be receptive to different opinions. Even though the whole group agrees on that one view, the devil's advocate is supposed to search for alternative solutions to the problem.

     
  • At October 19, 2009 at 10:12 PM , Anonymous en said...

    Another way to combat groupthink would be to monitor the group's behaviour. Making sure that symptoms of groupthink such as having shared stereotypes and having the illusion of unanimity does not occur in the group is also a measure that the devil's advocate or any members in the group can take note of. They must also be aware of the symptoms and try to prevent their group from being involved in groupthink.

     
  • At October 20, 2009 at 10:59 PM , Anonymous Jane said...

    People normally have the misconception that extroverts are more suitable to work in groups as compared to introverts. I believe that the main reason for group work is NOT to train ourselves to be more vocal and out-going (from an introvert to extrovert), rather, it's a platform for the group members to try and accept other people's point of views. There may be some points that we ourselves may have missed out, and by working in a group, we will be able to have these "missing gaps" filled, and at the same time, widen our horizon.

     
  • At October 21, 2009 at 12:15 AM , Anonymous en said...

    I feel that another reason that we would work together in a group would be to find out our shortcomings. Like mentioned above, we work in groups to accept other people's point of view. It actually trains us to think and see things in a wider perspective and not just from one perspective when someone points out something different from what we see.

     
  • At October 21, 2009 at 10:43 AM , Anonymous George said...

    Agreed. Everyone has a different skillset and being open to the ideas of others will result in work produced being of a higher quality. It would be pointless for members of a group to all have the same skillset as that would not result in the best quality of work.

     
  • At October 25, 2009 at 10:02 PM , Anonymous Darrelle said...

    I agree that working in groups would help us find out our shortcomings. It will also stregthen every members' weakness with the other members' strength.

     
  • At October 29, 2009 at 11:09 PM , Anonymous lucas said...

    Personally,I have encountered group members who are not cooperative and this hindered our progress towards completion of the task.My group member was unwillingly to meet up after lessons which ended late that day.Due to that,it led to many conflicts between my members and her.As a result,many others took for granted that since she can do that,why not i?It is not fair to your other group mates by avoiding meetings and not contributing at all.This decreased productivity and we also had a tight deadline to meet.Therefore working as a group also has its cons as well.

     
  • At November 3, 2009 at 10:55 PM , Anonymous May said...

    Well, it is no doubt that internal conflicts/disagreements may occur during group works. I guess this is just part of the learning process cum character development where one has to learn to be willing to accept others' decisions, and apply it in the real world.

     
  • At November 4, 2009 at 11:19 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

    In the process of group discussion, communication is essential in all stages. From the start of the formation of the group to the end of the project, communication is indispensable. Without communication, group members cannot work efficiently and thus the results of the project may not be desirable.Communication covers many components like face to face communication. For example in decision making, communication is required for members to express their opinions. Instead of making a decision recklessly, one should communicate with the entire group so this will fasten the pace at which the group is working. Thus, communication is the an important factor in determining a group's performance.

     
  • At November 5, 2009 at 9:05 PM , Anonymous Karen said...

    I feel that working in groups will also unknowingly reveal our inner selfs/personalities... I guess this eventually can make us understand each other better in the long run...

     
  • At November 5, 2009 at 9:17 PM , Anonymous Anne said...

    In your analysis, you've mentioned these: "According to Moreland and Levine, there are five stages in this process...new member...full member...marginal member...ex-member." well quite an eye-opener for me because I didnt know that such role terms exist. Well but I was wondering, when you're in a group, there's bound to have questioner, meditator etc... where do these group of people fall under then?

     
  • At November 5, 2009 at 9:49 PM , Anonymous en said...

    What I have mentioned prospective member, new member, full member, marginal member, ex-member are the group socialisation process and it is only in these five stages. For harmoniser coordinator etc are the task and maintanence roles that members are able to assume to better facilitate group work. By assuming these task and maintenance roles, it will help the group the accomplish their tasks and enhance social climate of the group.

     
  • At November 5, 2009 at 10:15 PM , Anonymous wei jie said...

    I encountered this group of people that i have to work with and they were a very horrid bunch of people. First of all, they did not as for my opinion on decision of matters. I did not say anything because i thought they were just being anxious. But towards the end, they just assigned roles and jobs to me without consulting me. It a "you do" and not " is it ok if you do this?" i feel that they are not being respectful to me. How much effort will it take to just ask " are you fine with the arrangement?" it is basic courtesy to do that!

     
  • At November 5, 2009 at 10:38 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

    The most dramatic incident I have ever encountered during a group work was when my group went to conduct an interview with a professor. Because of the different individual's thinkings, my friend actually "argued" his theory with the rest of us IN FRONT OF THE PROFESSOR!!! Well, i guess this is an inevitable thing that you cannot avoid when you're doing group work - arguing with your fellow groupmates. haha...

     
  • At November 8, 2009 at 10:28 PM , Anonymous Tony said...

    To work in groups simply means to cooperate with people be it from different age groups, backgrounds and different characteristics to achieve one common goal. Although we may find it better to work in a group, sometimes we will achieve much more when working alone because we can make decisions faster by ourselves.

     

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home